The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Tek
Of the two universities, which one would you consider easier to get into? I would suppose it varies from subject to subject, but does anyone have a rough idea overall?
Thanks.


Cambridge is better across the board so I'd say Oxford. Oxford has a good reputation but is clearly second best
They're both very similar, I think. I got in to Cambridge to do natural sciences - I would like to think I would have got in to Oxford as well (but that may not be the case). They are treated as Oxbridge - which surely emphasises some similarity!
Reply 3
Based on that statistics they list for successful applicants (eg http://www.admissions.ox.ac.uk/courses/hist.shtml ) it would seem that Oxford has a higher successful applications percentage than Cambridge ( http://www.cam.ac.uk/cambuniv/ugprospectus/applying/applying02f.html ).
Reply 4
HMMMM!!!

Oxford is most definitely not easier to get into than cambridge!!! dear oh dear.

They are both the same, it depends who interviews you etc. The stats are skewed as there may not be the same number of applicants to each institution etc.

You shouldn't be wanting to make your choice on which is 'easier' to get into anyway, go for the one offering your course and better options.

Getting into either is a great achievement.
Reply 5
onlywee
HMMMM!!!

Oxford is most definitely not easier to get into than cambridge!!! dear oh dear.

They are both the same, it depends who interviews you etc. The stats are skewed as there may not be the same number of applicants to each institution etc.

You shouldn't be wanting to make your choice on which is 'easier' to get into anyway, go for the one offering your course and better options.

Getting into either is a great achievement.


I gotta agree with what you're saying. I think though that there is a lower applicant/place ratio at cambridge.

Phil
Reply 6
It depends. Cambridge generally requires 30 ucas points whereas Oxford ask for 29 (according to The Student Guide) and Cambridge are at the top of the league tables. However, when I was deciding between Cam and Ox to read Arch and Anth I found that the Oxford entry proceedure seemed biased towards those who'd had lots of previous experince, testing the knowledge of applicants rather than the way they thought. So I went for Cam and haven't looked back since. :biggrin:
Reply 7
They're both easy to get into. After I got my BCDE grades for A-level, Oxford and Cambridge were begging me to join them. I however thought "naaa" and decided to go with Essex, who are by far the best. :wink:
Pencil
They're both easy to get into. After I got my BCDE grades for A-level, Oxford and Cambridge were begging me to join them. I however thought "naaa" and decided to go with Essex, who are by far the best. :wink:


LOL, there's nowt wrong with Essex! Dr Nick Baylis who now teaches at Cambridge University in Positive Psychology attended Essex!!
Reply 9
Pencil
They're both easy to get into. After I got my BCDE grades for A-level, Oxford and Cambridge were begging me to join them. I however thought "naaa" and decided to go with Essex, who are by far the best. :wink:


Im guessing you also turned down LSE, Harvard,and Yale!

Phil
Reply 10
every year 1 person has got into cambridge from my school usually for law but no-one has got into oxford for years
emom100
every year 1 person has got into cambridge from my school usually for law but no-one has got into oxford for years


What kind of school is yours? (She asks cynically)
emom100
every year 1 person has got into cambridge from my school usually for law but no-one has got into oxford for years
Hey, true for my school as well.

Hardly anyone gets into Oxford. In fact, nobody got into Oxford this year, from my year, although 3 people got into Cambridge.
Vin
Hey, true for my school as well.

Hardly anyone gets into Oxford. In fact, nobody got into Oxford this year, from my year, although 3 people got into Cambridge.


I think Cam tends to go more on the way student thinks and their potential to better themselves and Oxford likes a student to have had plenty of experience/further training. If people from your year are good thinkers but have had little opportunity to develop practically that could explain it. According to the league tables Cam is harder to get into!
I would say that it probably depends from subject to subject, for for maths (the one that I have experience of) Oxford definately has lower requirements for grades.
In my further maths class there were two of us, one applied to Oxford and I applied to Cambridge. We both got offers of similiar difficulty for A levels but cambridge wanted much more on the STEP papers.
When it comes to the results neither of us made our offers, but he got into Oxford with lower grades (in A level and STEP) than I did and was rejected from Cambridge (though this may have summat with me gettin a U in STEP 2). I'm at Bath anyway, so that can't be bad

Hope this is of some use
Reply 15
Haz
I think Cam tends to go more on the way student thinks and their potential to better themselves and Oxford likes a student to have had plenty of experience/further training.
Why do you consider this the case?
Egan1
Why do you consider this the case?


When I was deciding whether to apply to Oxford or Cambridge to read Arch and Anth I looked at admissions proceedures and interview profiles. Oxford seemed to be interested in experience and facts whereas Cambridge seemed to be (and were!) more interested in the candidate's potential to develop rather than what opportunities they'd had already. For someone such as me who was not given the option to study archaeology A'level but was keenly interested in both subjects from back ground reading, this was ideal.

Friends who have applied to both Oxford and Cambridge agree that this seems to be a common feature and may account for the fact that Oxford takes a higher proportion of students from the private sector.
Reply 17
Haz
When I was deciding whether to apply to Oxford or Cambridge to read Arch and Anth I looked at admissions proceedures and interview profiles. Oxford seemed to be interested in experience and facts whereas Cambridge seemed to be (and were!) more interested in the candidate's potential to develop rather than what opportunities they'd had already.
Hmmm...well it probably depends but I'd say both unis would be interested in both- Obviously they're going to want to know about past work etc but also in future potential -if they (Oxford) weren't they wouldn't need to bother with the interview system because they could just determin things from past grades etc...
Reply 18
emom100
every year 1 person has got into cambridge from my school usually for law but no-one has got into oxford for years


It's the opposite at my school...my school is very oxfordy with many going there and hardly any to cambridge. I'm applying to Cambridge though.
Reply 19
Unregistered
I would say that it probably depends from subject to subject, for for maths (the one that I have experience of) Oxford definately has lower requirements for grades.
In my further maths class there were two of us, one applied to Oxford and I applied to Cambridge. We both got offers of similiar difficulty for A levels but cambridge wanted much more on the STEP papers.
When it comes to the results neither of us made our offers, but he got into Oxford with lower grades (in A level and STEP) than I did and was rejected from Cambridge (though this may have summat with me gettin a U in STEP 2). I'm at Bath anyway, so that can't be bad

Hope this is of some use


Cool!!!! I'm going to Bath to do Maths this year (and got rejected from cambridge after my results!). are you in your second year, or starting this year, like me?

Latest

Trending

Trending